Ann Diener, PEACE STRATEGIST & News. Serving Our World

There was an uneasy feeling about the potential for a Donald Trump Presidency from inside the GOP last summer, one that started long before Trump won the nomination.

Those who were familiar with Trump were growing concerned about his ties to the mafia, the lawsuits – many of which were civil and whitewashed.  What we mean by “whitewashed is that under any other circumstance, without a well connected individual named – would have been considered criminal and would have resulted in felony criminal cases.  The Trump University alone should have cost him 20 years.  In nearly every failed deal, and nobody fails like Trump, money was stolen, misrepresentations were made and in some of the cases, Trump’s own mouth did it, pure felonies for any “non-connected mafia don.”

Those in positions of power who questioned his credibility and his background already had this information on his ties to Roy Cohn, Felix Sater, the many lawsuits, Jeffrey Epstein, as well as countless documents that showed a clear pattern of someone who was vulnerable for blackmail. An individual or group of individuals within the GOP wanted to look further, to find out if there was something peculiar going on between Trump and Moscow. They wanted more. Later Democrats took over their charge and began to pay Fusion GPS too.

Fusion, a private intelligence firm, had gathered what they could, which until this point was not enough to tip the scales on Trump for their client, so they needed to find someone with direct contacts in Russia, someone with credibility and experience and who knew how and where to look to gather the goods on Trump.

Fusion contacted Christopher Steele who had worked in Russia starting in 1990 for three years as a young spy, who witnessed the collapse of the Soviet Union. Steele returned in 2004 and served until 2009, heading the M.I.6’s Russia Station. Steele later retired and joined Orbis Business Intelligence LTD, where he was able to use the years of trade craft for private clients’ risk analysis.

After being hired by Fusion, Steele, with well over twenty years experience and field knowledge, meticulously contacted old “comrades” working inside Russia to present what would later become the 35 page dossier. This dossier was not compiled for the general public. It was compiled for top GOPers and later some Democrats who sought to gain a better understanding of what was behind Trump in Russia, and if he was vulnerable to “Kompromat ”

The dossier only became released to the public when it was published on BuzzFeed on January 10, well after the election. According to various reports, Steele had thought the dossier itself was enough to flip the election, showing the lurid details of influence, hacking and leaking that were ongoing between the Trump campaign, Russians and Wikileaks. The public acknowledgment of foreknowledge by Trump officials of the coming leaks of hacked material should have been enough to corroborate and validate information included in the dossier.

Yet, even when the dossier was released to the public, the Mainstream Media – the same media that bolstered the case for the fraudulent and unnecessary war in Iraq, the one that only lightly questioned the backers of the terrorists involved in the “War on Terror,” and the media that also refused to cover the various potential criminal conspiracies surrounding Trump – focused on the “golden showers” aspect of the dossier, leaving out his background of serving as a conduit for Russia cash, the publicly discussed hacks and leaks by his surrogates, as well as the clear pattern that emerged from not only the dossier, but that tied in with Trump’s personal business dealings that had gone on for more than 8 years.

It was confirmed, according to the dossier, that Trump served as a direct conduit to the Kremlin.

From the dossier, “Source close to Trump campaign however confirms regular exchange with Kremlin has existed for at least 8 years, including intelligence fed back to Russia on oligarchs’ activities in the US.”

This information fits with the various reports stating that oligarchs that had bought condos in Trump properties, in what has appeared to many to be a virtual means for laundering Russian cash in the US, which was at the time a top concern of the Kremlin. This also brings to mind the ongoing attempted computer links found with Alfa Bank to Trump Tower, found during the Trump campaign.

Alfa Bank was also mentioned in the dossier, misspelled as Alpha Bank.

“Top level Russian government official described the Putin-Alpha relationship as both the carrot and stick. ” Though Alfa was later said to be controlled by “the most enduringly successful, western-oriented (if hard-edged) capitalists in Russia,” according to Fortune Magazine  and who were seemingly at odds with Putin.

In one exchange sited in the Fortune article, “One former employee of the bank recalls a ceremony 10 years back at which (Mikhail) Fridman’s partner  (in Alfa) Pyotr Aven, a deputy prime minister who has headed the group’s government relations, was due to receive an award from Putin. An awkward exchange (allegedly) ran as follows:

“Putin: ‘Remind me, why am I giving this to you?’

“Aven: ‘Because I haven’t done anything you can put me in jail for.’

“Putin: ‘No, not yet. ‘ ”

So, why was Alfa Bank repeatedly trying to connect with Trump tower?

With that multitudes of attempted virtual links by Alfa and the knowledge of potential money laundering schemes with Russian oligarchs, well known mafia ties and the dossier further connecting the dots to illegal hacking and leaking, potentially purposefully done, combined together, this should have been enough to bring Trump under public scrutiny before the election.

Why did it take so long to reach the public, and why is there still an ongoing cover-up by the GOP? Perhaps, the potential for blackmail of a sitting US President is not enough?

Last week, Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa petitioned “Glenn Simpson, the head of Fusion GPS, to identify the clients who hired him to dig up dirt on Trump during the campaign.”

The Republican Senator is not concerned about the information that amounts to hacking and leaking done by Russians, nor is he concerned by money laundering and potential criminal activity conducted by someone who is now a sitting President, and the fact that the information was known prior to the election. It is now known globally.

Is he not concerned about the reputation of the country he chooses to serve, or is he more concerned about the “who did to them” aspect?

This idea of labeling and misdirection has been ongoing with Trump and officials tied to the campaign, as well as by current administration staff. The Mainstream Media cherry picks the stories to be let out to the public and still allows the words, “Fake News” to be associated with the dossier, even though it was compiled by a spy with more than 20 years field experience.

Comparing that to the experience of those within the administration making superficial claims and Trump operatives actually claiming foreknowledge for incidents cited in the dossier, one would have to wonder if there is anyone telling the truth and willing to investigate this thoroughly to protect our National Security?

It seems absurd that someone, even the White House Press Secretary, can claim to debunk something like the reporting on the Steele dossier by calling it “Fake News,” even if he says it twice.

Just the words “Fake News” do not debunk the dossier, which is “becoming more true every day”, as the Senate Intelligence Committee may finally choose to interview Christopher Steele, directly.

And the BBC reports that Trump Russia dossier key claim ‘verified’

“The BBC has learned that US officials ‘verified’ a key claim in a report about Kremlin involvement in Donald Trump’s election – that a Russian diplomat in Washington was in fact a spy.”

Steele wrote in the dossier, “A leading Russian diplomat, Mikhail KULAGIN, had been withdrawn from Washington at short notice because Moscow feared his heavy involvement in the US presidential election operation… would be exposed in the media there.”

It was found that “There was no diplomat called Kulagin in the Russian embassy; there was a Kalugin,” said the BBC, who verified that Kalugin was indeed considered a spy by US intelligence.

When asked to comment on this to the BBC reporter, Trump former top political adviser Roger Stone and ally, said to him about Steele, “scornfully: ‘If 007 wants to be taken seriously, he ought to learn how to spell.’

After Trump and Stone publicly parted ways, Stone contacted Russian hacker, Guccifer 2.0 “at least 16 times during the 2016 campaign” of which Stone said “That’s Called Networking.”

Not only was Stone in communication with the Russian Hacker, but he was, according to himself, in contact with Wikileaks, “Stone began discussing WikiLeaks and Assange in August 2016. Stone told a local Republican Party group in Florida on August 10 that he had ‘communicated with Julian Assange,’ according to CNN.

The information he gathered lead to an infamous tweet.

Stone repeatedly made claims in advance of what was to be leaked by Wikileaks.

More from the CNN article: “In an interview later in August, Stone suggested that Assange had material that included emails deleted by Clinton aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills. At other times, Stone said the material released would be related to the Clinton Foundation.

“On August 21, Stone tweeted that ‘it will soon the Podesta’s time in the barrel.’ Stone claimed in an October 19 Breitbart post that he did not have advanced knowledge that Podesta’s hacked emails would be leaked, claiming his tweet was about Podesta’s business dealings.

“In mid-September, Stone said on Boston Herald Radio that he expects, ‘Julian Assange and the Wikileaks people to drop a payload of new documents on a weekly basis fairly soon. And that of course will answer the question of exactly what was erased on that email server.’

Considering that both the dossier and a report from the US Intelligence Community have stated that Wikileaks laundered the hacked emails to the public and potentially other groups, was Stone complicit?

From the Steele dossier:  “Trump associate admits Kremlin behind recent appearance of DNC emails on Wikileaks, as a means of maintaining plausible deniability.

“Agreed exchange of information established in both directions. Trump’s team using moles within DNC and hackers in the US as well as outside in Russia.”

From the Intelligence Community report, Assessing Russian Activities and Intentions in Recent US Elections, a report including “an analytic assessment drafted and coordinated among The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and The National Security Agency (NSA).”:

“We assess with high confidence that Russian military intelligence (General Staff Main Intelligence Directorate or GRU) used the Guccifer 2.0 persona and DCLeaks.com to release US victim data obtained in cyber operations publicly and in exclusives to media outlets and relayed material to WikiLeaks.”

If indeed Wikileaks served as a vehicle for the Russian hacker(s), the information seems to have been used for much more than was originally disclosed.

According to a source in the BBC article sited above, ” ‘This is a three-headed operation,’ said one former official, setting out the case, based on the intelligence: Firstly, hackers steal damaging emails from senior Democrats. Secondly, the stories based on this hacked information appear on Twitter and Facebook, posted by thousands of automated ‘bots’, then on Russia’s English-language outlets, RT and Sputnik, then right-wing US ‘news’ sites such as Infowars and Breitbart, then Fox and the mainstream media. Thirdly, Russia downloads the online voter rolls.
“The voter rolls are said to fit into this because of ‘microtargeting’. Using email, Facebook and Twitter, political advertising can be tailored very precisely: individual messaging for individual voters.

“ ‘You are stealing the stuff and pushing it back into the US body politic,’ said the former official sited in the BBC report, ‘you know where to target that stuff when you’re pushing it back.’ ”

“This would take co-operation with the Trump campaign, it is claimed.”

This claim is not far fetched at all thinking about who was Trump’s largest campaign backer, Robert Mercer, his company that operated in the background during the election, Cambridge Analytica and the originator of the term, microtargeting, Nigel Oakes founder of Strategic Communication Laboratories (SCL), that was later spun into Cambridge Analytica.

SCL is now known as “a private Russian behavioral research and strategic communication company. SCL is known as Cambridge Analytica in the United States.”

According to Cambridge CEO Alexander Nix said to Bloomberg’s Sasha Issenburg.
“Your behavior is driven by your personality and actually the more you can understand about people’s personality as psychological drivers, the more you can actually start to really tap in to why and how they make their decisions. We call this behavioral microtargeting and this is really our secret sauce, if you like. This is what we’re bringing to America.”

If Cambridge Analytica/SCL was able to gain access the Wikileaks hacked DNC emails and then use its capabilities potentially relating with the illegally obtained voter rosters in Russia, this may be the largest missing piece of data not found in the dossier or in the US Intelligence report.

It would seem improbable that a group so closely aligned with the Trump campaign would have nothing to do with utilizing the information obtained by hackers laundered through Wikileaks, because that is specifically what they clearly state they do, is to obtain information to microtarget people/voters.

By now, the intelligence community and the Senate should not only be taking a closer look at the dossier, but also at Cambridge Analytica and SCL to determine the role they may have played in regards to the hacked emails and their use to spin truly “Fake News” on the public prior to the election.

They should be questioning, what role did SCL play on the Russian side? Where were the “Fake News” stories originating from?

Why hasn’t Cambridge Analytica/SCL been mentioned by those investigating this in Congress? Could it be that GOP players may not have wanted Cambridge Analytica/SCL mentioned because they hoped to use their services in the future, and hoped to obtain Mercer money?

When it is so obvious that the world knows our President may be compromised, we have to wonder why our leadership is doing so little, so late?

Today you are less free. You were told corporations needed to see your “internet habits,” so they could make money selling your private life to potential advertisers, that in itself is a tragedy, but it is also not true. Google controls most internet searches and has always done that.

You see, browsing habits and searches are not the same. When you go to the Social Security, your bank or the IRS website,  you “browse.” Now what you do there will be permanently sold to the highest bidder, forever – what you buy, forms you fill out, your Skype conversations and email – all of it is “browser content.”

Some is video from your laptop camera, some is email, all is now unprotected, easily gathered, no hacking required, not anymore, and used for what purpose?

That’s the kicker.

By removing the restrictions aimed at protecting consumers and by ending the possibility for future legislation for protecting consumers, Congress has just opened the door to social engineering of Americans through “microtargeting” by big data with information purchased from Internet Service Providers (ISPs).

The bill, blocking internet privacy rules passed by the Federal Communications Commission last year, passed by the House on Tuesday is on its way to the President’s desk with an additional bill that prohibits regulations from being passed in the future.

According to The Hill:  “The FCC rules would have given consumers greater control over what their internet service provider can do with their data by requiring those companies to get permission from customers before using their information to create targeted advertisements.

“The rules had not yet gone into effect. The bill, which passed the Senate last week in a party-line vote, invokes a law called the Congressional Review Act (CRA) that allows Congress to undo recently passed regulations. A CRA bill also prohibits agencies from passing similar regulations in the future.”

Eliminating these restrictions goes beyond selling you a new television or offering you a lower interest rate on your home using advertising, this data that is being bought and sold goes directly to companies like Cambridge Analytica, who assemble personality profiles of internet users that can be used in psychological operations.

What are the boundaries of the information that your internet service provider can gather about you?

“Your broadband provider knows deeply personal information about you and your family – where you are, what you want to know, every site you visit, and more,” House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said before the vote on Tuesday.

Even more serious to consider is that your ISP has every email and the content in every email ever written by or sent to you in their database, as well as every form you have filled out online including medical information and has access to your online banking information which contains every purchase you have made electronically. Blending the data together from your ISP, tech companies can create a personality profile that can be easily used to manipulate you.

Enter in Big Data

“Any company can aggregate and purchase big data, but Cambridge Analytica has developed a model to translate that data into a personality profile used to predict, then ultimately change your behavior. That model itself was developed by paying a Cambridge psychology professor to copy the groundbreaking original research of his colleague through questionable methods that violated Amazon’s Terms of Service. Based on its origins, Cambridge Analytica appears ready to capture and buy whatever data it needs to accomplish its ends,” according to Scout in an article The Rise of the Weaponized AI Propaganda Machine.

“Your behavior is driven by your personality and actually the more you can understand about people’s personality as psychological drivers, the more you can actually start to really tap in to why and how they make their decisions,” Cambridge CEO Alexander Nix said to Bloomberg’s Sasha Issenburg. “We call this behavioral microtargeting and this is really our secret sauce, if you like. This is what we’re bringing to America.”

The repeal of the internet privacy legislation will insure that companies such as Cambridge Analytica can purchase basically all of your information directly from your Internet Service Provider to further perfect your personality profile, which can be used to shape and mold your beliefs in the future using “behavioral microtargeting”.

Everything is now connected – from your car, your appliances and now Elon Musk is even attempting to connect your brain and all of your thoughts to your computer.

“Elon Musk, the founder of SpaceX, Tesla, and a man who wants to nuke Mars, has founded a new company. According to WSJsources, Neuralink is a new venture that aims to pursue ‘neural lace’ technology to help brains interface with computers,” according to a BGR article that appeared on yahoo news, Elon Musk, very normal non-supervillain, starts company to implant electrodes in your brain.

” “Neuralink’s aim, according to the WSJ‘s sources, is to implant tiny electrodes in the brain that may allow for two-way interfacing with computers, allowing users to ‘one day upload and download thoughts.’ Although Musk didn’t confirm his involvement, one of the firm’s founding team members confirmed his involvement. Neuralink registered as a medical research company in California last year.”

Even your DNA is no longer safe, as employers may soon be require DNA testing of employees if the Republicans pass H.R.1313 – Preserving Employee Wellness Programs Act through Congress and the President signs it. The question that needs to be asked is will your DNA information be available on computers? Of course it will. Then it can potentially be collected by the ISPs and sold to big data.

According to CNBC, “Workers participating in so-called workplace wellness programs reportedly could be ordered to get genetic testing — and hand over the results — by their employers or face financial penalties, if a bill being pushed by congressional Republican becomes law.”

The Republican party and its “conservative” values have certainly been acting not so conservative. With legislation aimed at enabling surveillance and big data everywhere including in your DNA, what happened to rugged individualism?

The FBI case has been exposed, and was exposed in during the election cycle about Donald Trump’s ties to the Russian mafia through Felix Sater and the numerous other Russian and otherwise, organized crime figures surrounding Trump.

Why did this information not reach the public, so that they could make an honest decision about Trump early on, before the election? Why has the Mainstream Media repeated and repeated the Russia ties story, while so much information has been available for so long connecting Trump to the Russian mafia and oligarchs who bought condos in his buildings?

According to a recent expose’ on Who.What.Why., Why FBI Can’t Tell All on Trump, Russia, “Efforts to try to get this information to the public appear to have been aggressively blocked by the DOJ because it would potentially expose their own operations — both those that have been effective and others that have not.”

This in-depth investigation takes readers through the assorted documented contacts between Trump and organized crime.

The interesting portion is the way the situation in Ukraine is framed. It is framed solely depending on the movements of organized crime to “shield” key players and give favor to “Russian causes” involved in the conflict.

https://youtu.be/KIvRljAaNgg

No mention of the Western coup is present, nor the $5 billion US dollars spent to facilitate the coup, nor the fact that the Crimean people are ethnic Russians who voted to re-join Russia because of the far-right that had been installed in Ukraine, due to a foreign backed putsch.

Lest we remember US-Assistant Secretary of State for European and Eurasian Affairs, Victoria Nuland’s role in the coup and designing the post coup government, far more important than the curse word directed towards the EU:

So again, why has the information on Trump not been fully released to the public, even prior to the election, so that voters could make a choice as to whether they wanted a man closely tied to organized crime in the White House?

Looking at the election itself, there were numerous factors that show the election was actually stolen for Trump including:

Over-voting, meaning more votes on the voting machines than signatures in Wisconsin, with cities reporting 95% to over 100% turnout and more votes than voters.

Voters were purged – meaning removed from the voter rolls while still having absentee ballots sent to them. The vote purges involved Cross Check, investigated by Greg Palast, as a method of purging voters in multiple states using a database that matched only first and last names to fraudulently purge voters of various ethnic groups, that potentially typically vote Democratic. The system was implemented in 27 states and headed by Kris Kobach, Kansas Secretary of State, who shortly after the election was positioned as an adviser to Trump on immigration reform.

Broken scanners were given to poor, Democratic communities in Detroit, Michigan. ” ‘It’s not good,’ Detroit Elections Director Daniel Baxter told the Detroit News Tuesday, before the judge halted the recount. He blamed the discrepancies on the city’s decade-old voting machines, saying 87 optical scanners broke on Election Day, the newspaper reported.”  These precincts were not eligible for a recount because of the discrepancies, according to Michigan election law.

Voting machine audit functions and safety protocols were turned off, in Ohio, despite the fact that,  “the FBI has raised fears of fiddling these machines by Russian hackers. Yet, the Republican Secretary of State of Ohio, Jon Husted, is allowing county officials to simply turn off these security functions — with no explanation as to why. The counties, Fitrakis discovered, ‘bought state-of-the-art equipment and turned off the security,’ both the ballot imaging function and the audit application that can detect and record evidence of machine tampering.”

So, if the FBI was aware of possible tampering “hacking” of the election, and they were aware of the mafia ties to Trump, why was he allowed to be elected?

Is Trump being used to net a larger fish, or rather bear, at behest of NATO?

Behind this thought process lies the ties to the high tech management of perceptions found in Cambridge Analytica, a company tied to one of Trump’s largest supporters, Robert Mercer. This company has been written about in the Guardian and elsewhere as providing the far-right a vehicle from which to manage and alter perceptions.

According to Carole Cadwalladr in the article, Robert Mercer: the big data billionaire waging war on mainstream media, “there was another reason why I recognised Robert Mercer’s name: because of his connection to Cambridge Analytica, a small data analytics company. He is reported to have a $10m stake in the company, which was spun out of a bigger British company called SCL Group. It specialises in ‘election management strategies’ and ‘messaging and information operations’, refined over 25 years in places like Afghanistan and Pakistan. In military circles this is known as ‘psyops’ – psychological operations. (Mass propaganda that works by acting on people’s emotions.)

“Cambridge Analytica worked for the Trump campaign and, so I’d read, the Leave campaign. When Mercer supported Cruz, Cambridge Analytica worked with Cruz. When Robert Mercer started supporting Trump, Cambridge Analytica came too. And where Mercer’s money is, Steve Bannon is usually close by: it was reported that until recently he had a seat on the board.

“Last December, I wrote about Cambridge Analytica in a piece about how Google’s search results on certain subjects were being dominated by rightwing and extremist sites. Jonathan Albright, a professor of communications at Elon University, North Carolina, who had mapped the news ecosystem and found millions of links between rightwing sites ‘strangling’ the mainstream media, told me that trackers from sites like Breitbart could also be used by companies like Cambridge Analytica to follow people around the web and then, via Facebook, target them with ads.

“On its website, Cambridge Analytica makes the astonishing boast that it has psychological profiles based on 5,000 separate pieces of data on 220 million American voters – its USP is to use this data to understand people’s deepest emotions and then target them accordingly. The system, according to Albright, amounted to a ‘propaganda machine’.”

Looking at the foundation for Cambridge Analytica, it was spun off from SCL (Strategic Communication Laboratories) Group British founded by Nigel Oakes, who also initially set up a research facility set up for strategic communication, potentially international psychological operations, called the Behavioural Dynamics Institute (BDI) that was founded in 1990. This was followed by Strategic Communication Laboratories in 1993, which was able to obtain contracts to influence elections internationally and perceptions for NATO.

From a Wikipedia capture of its website, “SCL has influenced elections in Italy, Latvia, Ukraine, Albania, Romania, South Africa, Nigeria, Kenya, Mauritius, India, Indonesia, Thailand, Taiwan, Colombia, Antigua, St. Vincent & the Grenadines, St. Kitts & Nevis, Trinidad & Tobago.”

“In 2007, SCL paid $20,000 to a Washington lobbying company, Global Policy Partners, to promote it in the US. SCL won contracts with the Pentagon to conduct surveys in Iran and Yemen. ‘Psych-ops was big business and people were just chucking money around,’ said one person familiar with the company,” according to a March 4, 2017 article in the Guardian, Did Cambridge Analytica influence the Brexit vote and the US election?

“In 2015, it secured a $750,000 contract to help Nato states counter Russian propaganda in eastern Europe,” according to a March 4, 2017 article in the Guardian, Did Cambridge Analytica influence the Brexit vote and the US election? More information about the contract is found here.

If SCL/Cambridge Analytica is involved with NATO and Trump, Brexit and potentially other far-right candidates who have seemed to be courting Russian President, Vladimir Putin, what is going on?

Could it be that the far-right’s courtship of Putin is a mere trap to hide the sins of the West in regards to regime change in Ukraine and sponsorship of terrorists in Syria and elsewhere at behest of a clash of civilizations plan for Greater Israel and a Caliphate?

Looking at the current opposition in Russia by Alexei Navalny and his supporters who staged protests last weekend, an interesting parallel can be found. Navalny has long appealed to the far-right while his two main advisers are of Jewish ancestry.

According to the Times of Israel, September 9, 2013 article, Nationalist backed by Jewish advisers fails in Moscow mayor bid, “His campaign strategy was developed by Leonid Volkov and Maksim Kats, two tech-savvy Jews who provided Navalny with outside-the-box strategies designed to offset his disadvantage against Sobyanin.”

When examining the backgrounds of his advisers, one begins to question, is Navalny following a similar pattern to Trump?

Another interesting pattern also emerges with the contacts of the Trump campaign with the Russian government.

With the success achieved by Russia in countering terrorism in Syria that started in September of 2015, Russia took the world by storm and off-set what seemed to be the potential for a full blown Islamic State based on Wahhabist extremism set to operate in Syria. Russia changed the direction of the war, against the terrorists, and returned the strength to Syrian secularism.

Is it a coincidence that Trump advisers began meeting with the Russian government, slowly over time gaining trust that if Trump won, his administration would be committed to working together to fight terrorism in Syria and work to solve the misconceptions regarding Ukraine?

If agencies have information of “Russian hacking,” is it also possible that sophisticated bots impersonated “Russian hackers” in regards to the 2016 election?

However, with so much evidence of domestic vote rigging, was Russia even necessary to steal the election?

Post election, Cambridge Analytica was also given a contract to manage the perceptions of the President and the incoming administration.

“But the role of CA may not end with the election victory of Trump. According to the British newspaper The Guardian CA negotiated ‘two rich contracts’, one to handle the image and message of the new administration, the other to deal with the marketing of the company that bears the name of the new president.

“With the Sole 24 Ore article, CA declined to confirm or deny this negotiation, however, rejecting all other requests for information or interviews. But his influence on future White House will not result only from these two contracts. In its Board of Directors it is to be present Stephen Bannon, the former banker Goldman Sachs became a top manager of ultra-right websites, after directing the campaign of Trump, was named its ‘strategic advisor.’ And the most significant of Cambridge, American investor is Robert Mercer, the inscrutable New York financier, came to prominence during the election campaign to the side before Cruz then Trump and intended to retain an influential role on the new White House.”

As the FBI is aware of the mafia ties, the election rigging and also ongoing foreign perception management by the current administration upon the American public, a key question is why does the American public have to suffer?

It is not only rigging, perception management, an imposed President who clearly could be, and in all likelihood has been, controlled by mafia ties, that also may have an element of sex-blackmail operating in the background to potentially silence opponents, but it is the ongoing daily destruction by the administration of government infrastructure and protections for the people that is occurring.